By that measure they are going to have to deport De Zerbi.
PGMOL according to Companies House records, shows 3 individuals are persons with/of significant control (PSC).
- Trevor Birch - He is currently Chief Executive of the EFL.
His past includes being an executive at Spuds and Chelsea amongst others. He was Chief Executive of Chelsea and he led the ÂŁ180m sale of Chelsea to Abramovich - Anthony Scholes - He is Chief Football officer at the Premier League
- Andrew Ambler - Director of Professional Game Relations at the FA
PGMOL is not some independent body as purported.
The FA should be more concerned that the PGMOL which it co-owns has employed officials who cannot enforce rules because they often times appear not to even know the rules they are supposed to be enforcing. The refereeing disaster-class we see almost weekly brings the game in disrepute far more than any manager highlighting their ineptness ever could.
FA picks and chooses who to sanction, just as PGMOL picks and chooses when and if they are going to enforce rules or make them up as they feel.
LMAO, hilarious. I think it would really show them to be clowns if they attempted to ban him unless/until he apologizes.
Why dont we launch a stop being shit at your jobs then campaign
Like how theyâre using Arteta as their poster boy as well, even though he isnât the worst offender.
https://x.com/dailycannon/status/1727283763347136737?s=46&t=2U6XWqnXYlWg-4shy9vWIA
Also, that same man wrote this:
So really they are on the same side because Artetaâs rant was about VAR, not the on field referee.
This isnât a new thing, Ferguson and Mourinho constantly abused referees yet the media always went after Wenger because they werenât scared of him.
Henry Winter can eat my ass (and not in a fun way). The English mediaâs pearl clutching about the words Arteta used is baffling.
I think it might be a British thing. Like even when there is indisputable proof, you cannot call a fellow MP a liar in the House of Commons (although this rule was broken for Boris).
Itâs just not cricket olâ chap.
Gtfo. Is that a rule?
It is indeed a rule. You cannot make any accusations of lying while in the HoC. Not only towards sitting MPâs, but for ex MPâs too. This is evident when Rishi Sunak is talking about Jeremy Corbyn.
Itâs called parliamentary etiquette, and itâs quite silly, and quite British
Although MPâs can get around the rule by being a bit clever with their language
The word âmisledâ is often used instead.
You gotta wonder if that leads to people not understanding that MPs have lied. If the language gets softened so much.
They are also not allowed to call each other hooligans, cowards, gits and pipsqueeks.
Itâs ok, the media are allowed to call MPâs anything they like and journalists certainly know how to lie.
Dont worry, PGMOL will make it up to them at the Emirates
This is where the agenda talk comes undone, because letâs face it, they obviously donât have an agenda against Wolves! They are just completely incompetent! And until they can hire people who didnât graduate from clown university then they may as well ditch VAR. Itâs pointless if the people watching the replays can watch something a million times and still make the wrong call.
https://x.com/skysportspl/status/1729263884874194960?s=46&t=2U6XWqnXYlWg-4shy9vWIA
Spending five minutes forensically examining footage like trying to solve the assassination of JFK from the Zapruder film, is not overturning a clear and obvious error.
All this when the referee has decided not to make a decision in the first place, leaving VAR to do it for him.