There was litterly like 189 unread posts in this thread for me 
wondered what the fuck had happened
Iâve answered the question; you are the refusing to accept my answer.
You donât want to watch it shows the truth of what youâre advocating for.
I could keep it going another 189 easy and he still wonât answer the question. 
Freudian slip
2 Likes
I will say it again if donât accept my answer thatâs fine; donât come out with bs that I didnât answer the question.
I donât need to bring up statistics when the law states an abortion canât be carried out after 24 weeks unless there is serious health complications with the child or mother.
So we know abortions after 24 weeks only happen when the child is deformed, suffers from a serious illness, or if the woman was raped. So your 1% argument is in fact 100% of abortions, post 24 weeks.
The only test for down syndrome before 24 weeks is a test that could accidently abort the baby
Now you may argue 24 weeks is too high a cut off for abortions that donât fit into this bracket and thatâs maybe more of a reasonable discussion to be had. But no the only post 24 week abortions are where the fetus has a pretty severe illness or if the woman has been raped.
If you can find less severe reasons for post 24 week abortions, Iâd be interested in seeing them.
That is a false statement.
Just read a state saying 1.8% of a abortion in the U.K. are 19-24 weeks; it did not go in to the reason why.
Read a journal that was publish in 2008 called reproductive health matter; by their admission their say there is no particular reason the why women are haven second trimester abortions in the U.K.
In the journal itself a Marie stopes research found most second trimester abortion in the U.K. are done because some of the woman realised their were pregnant late on.
You are intentionally using the 1% argument to bolster your side and presenting false facts.
Without actually answering the question. Which you could have done a couple dozen times by now.
Guys stop
1 Like
No it isnât. I said âthird trimesterâ NOT âsecond trimesterâ, which youâre now discussing. Third trimester is after 24 weeks. The video you wanted to discuss was about abortions after 24 weeks, hence I am telling you the actual law for abortions after 24 weeks and the reasons they happen.
I stated Post 24 weeks, this means after the 24 weeks. Now youâre shifting the discussion about terminations from 19-24 weeks. This is a completely seperate debate and we can discuss this too after we agree on what we both consider ethical after 24 weeks.
So when we talk Post 24 weeks, every termination is âthe 1%â you refer to because that is the law.
Let me help your argument here. In terms of Post 24 weeks, you could argue that Downâs Syndrone is not a good enough reason to end a feutusâs life. I donât necessarily agree with this, itâs contencious.
So do you think a mother and father after discovering their child is downsydrome after 24 weeks (you canât scan for it before that) should be able to terminate such a pregnancy? I think they should have the right to do this, for the well being of all including the child whoâd have a painful life. the child would have all manner of health problems. But on the other hand if I had a child with down sydrome I would love him or her. However if the parents die, the downsydrome adult wouldnât be able to function in society. This is another consideration for parents.
The mother and father will have to make the choice and live with the outcome, whether you take that life or not it doesnât change at all.
Again what justification does it have for other 99% abortion cases you still have answered that; and of that 99% at least in America 1-2% is late term abortion.
England doesnât have third trimester abortion itâs illegal. The video in itself never outline anything with the health of the child, you are just associated for yourself.
You want to make abortion legal because of the 1%, ok we make it legal for the 1% none of you would be happy because youâd want it for 99% also; reason being morals, ethics and compassion, yet none of this is afforded to the unborn child that has done nothing wrong but exist.
Youâre the only one talking about this. Iâd like to take care of 100% of women who find themselves in the situation of needing an abortion (yes needing as opposed to wanting and itâs not up to me or you to decide which is which). You only want to take care of 1%âŚor at least youâre pretending you do anyway.
1 Like
Bought this to commemorate this awesome thread.
How this thread makes me feel.
Itâs wrong.
Just my two cents on a vital topic.
The ban or abortions?
Sad state of affairs⌠the insanity is that these are the same knuckleheads who are against planned parenthood and sex education and providing contraception to the world⌠frankly, plainly stupid, unrealistic, and insulting to women to suggest it is all on them to âjust close their legs.â
Just another reason to be embarrassed as an American - to those who oppose it on religious grounds, apologies, but I just canât tolerate the whole hypocritical and medieval views.
2 Likes
Itâs so medieval to say hey letâs offer the unborn child itâs human right to life 
; hey telling people if you donât want to get pregnant use the readily available contraception and be responsible!, thatâs just wrong.
you have said anything on the New York abortion bill? You are angry at a state that says sorry we want to protect the innocent life, but more then happy for another to advocate for killing the innocent in the womb up until birth.
Youâre such a massive arsehole.
1 Like
If it wasnât insanely hypocritical, I could at least appreciate a metaphysical debateâŚ
It reminds me of Monty Python with âevery sperm is sacredâ song.
We will never see eye to eye on this b/c it is ideology for you.
1 Like
Im not at all surprised that you stand behind this. Iâm not even going to start a argument, thereâs no point. The rest of the free world will thankfully still function as usual.
1 Like