hmm… lots of noises about dropping Laca but I don’t see Arteta doing that.
Unfortunately also I think focusing on Laca takes some attention from the bigger issue, imo, which is finding the best solution to make up for absences of Tierney and Partey (my preference is Saka for LB/WB and Xhaka in CM).
I get there is anger with Laca over his performance against Palace, but it isn’t long back since we were talking about being happy enough with link ups and assists even if he doesn’t score. Granted he wasn’t even doing that against Palace, but that was one match where everything fell off, so I’m not sure that is enough to drop him, and go with whatever alternative, which is questionable in of itself. Against Palace, honestly, there were at least 4 players who were sub-par at the same time.
Again I go back to manager charisma, motivation, and rockets up arses when appropriate, which I think is what Laca needs the most, not benching.
Context is ur friend. 9 years of negative net spend after gutting the team that made a CL final a year earlier. Or being a historically bad Arsenal team after having spent 500m since AW departed. These two arent the same. Doesn’t cost much to pay attention my dood
Arsenal made a CL quarterfinal (semi final too) with a whole bunch of young promsing players and only got jobbed by the refs. Also made the league cup final. Those types of things are coin flips. We stayed plenty relevant with guys like Bendtner, Walcott, Denilson, Flamini all playing major roles in our squad thanks to the negative net spend. Never been a better managing job done in the history of football managing…trophies or not.
Why is it every single thread I go in people are arguing about Wenger can’t we stick to the designated thread for that please sick of reading it everywhere
Difference is that if Klopp got 150mil while managing Arsenal or Atletico for Coutinho, the club are probably reivensting those funds elsewhere rather than bolstering the squad.