Do sacked managers not lose their contract when they get a new job?
So Poch is now at PSG and Jose at Roma
Nope, they donât lose the right to the money unless they quit.
They get that money one way or another.
5 Likes
Jose is the master at making money, always on a huge salary and often gets paid out early.
1 Like
Not only that, he spends stupid money that the club canât get back .
The money he wasted at Man U, over paying for mediocre players, was ridiculous.
He spends the most, plays boring football and heâs the biggest fraud in Europe
1 Like
No. Theyâve signed a contract, and if the club choose to break that contract then they have to pay off the remaining duration. The same goes for players.
1 Like
It depends on a few different factors including what was in the contracts they signed. I canât image spurs were given a get out by any of those three though, nor will Conte have given them one.
Under contract law they (the sacked manager) have a duty to mitigate their loss so theyâre not automatically entitled to get a replacement job on the same pay and get their notice paid up.
In practice they usually negotiate a settlement that is somewhere in the middle as the departing manager wants to be free to work somewhere new but the club will want certainty of the liability close to the point of departure and will not want to incentivise the sacked manager to be slow in gaining new employment.
Even so sacking the managers with long remaining terms will not have been cheap.
2 Likes
Fanking noun, singular: The art of recontextualizing a product by holding it near your crotch.
Fifth manager in a row that doesnât rate NâDombele or Lo Celso.
Bit early for that talk. Tis the Conference League after all.
Vitesse scored 2 against them?!
What does this mean as far as this uselessness competition is concerned?
Looks about ready to break out the Kleenex.
Vitesse were the better team over the course of the match. Even when Spurs blitzed them early the game was actually very back and forth, with the chances just going in on one side, and once their energy level dropped they were clearly second best even before Romero got sent off.
Spurs are in a similar place to where we were when Arteta first took over. Four or five legitimate players to build around, a few youth players that could come good or not, and then another fifteen guys stealing a living.
Iâm skeptical about Conte being able to work miracles with this team because Iâve seen the limitations involved in trotting out defenders and midfielders like Holding, Chambes, Cedric, Xhaka, Mari, and Elneny so powerfully over the last couple years and guys like Dier, Davies, Winks, Sanchez, Hojbjerg, and Skipp really arenât any better. Try to play high-octane, open aggressive football with those guys in the spine of your team and its going to end in tears, no matter who the manager might be.
If by âhorrific,â you mean wonderful.
1 Like
7 Likes
Nuno was paid about a million per PL match, which is even more than Mourinho got.
Between them, Pochettino, Mourinho, Nuno and Conte, have been paid around 100m from spurs.
Where do they get all this money from with a new stadium to pay for?
We had a begging bowl and were pleading poverty when we moved to the Emirates.
8 Likes
My guess (an afterthought): they overtook us performance-wise for a spell there due to two things: first it was our decline from not paying to refresh our squad making it impossible to compete with the red teams and the oil teams long term, and second they improved (in large part) due to getting the manager appointment just right with pooch. So now they think thatâs the way to go.
1 Like