Was their best forward
What does that mean when their forwards were fucking shit
Saying it like it really means something
A player who scored a hatrick in August and finished with 4 more PL goals
1 Like
Youâre too smart to treat Chelsea like a normal club. You know full well they treat players like assets over there.
If a defence play a very low block, rather than calling it a low bus, you could just say parking the coach.
It might catch on. 
1 Like
Who cares
Heâs a Chelsea cast off, reject whatever
Semantics
You donât have to respond to every post 
1 Like
It means he wasnât a reject. They flipped him for a profit, like they would anyone else if they could.
Thatâs their model. Selling a player doesnât mean theyâre a reject.
Was Kai a reject then?
Yeah, flipped him for a profit at our expense
I donât really care, he was mid last season and the fact they make a profit doesnât mean he wasnât a reject
Beat forward as if that means something, clearly it doesnât because they dumped him
Did we have to twist their arm to sign him?
4 Likes
For 65 million and what? 250k a weekâYES
He wasnât even supposed to be a striker.
The guy you want us to buy is a Brighton and Swansea reject btwâŚ
Yeah, he is. Heâs also a late bloomer who I bank on being a difference maker for us compared to this signin
Sanchez was a Barca reject, still was class for us. Ozil was too
Being a reject doesnât mean youâre trash, it means unwanted.
No it means being inadequate.
Ozil was certainly not inadequate.
They became inadequate for their clubs yes
Just like Madueke with Chelsea
Never heard of using salary as a reason to be classified as ârejectâ, anyway, doesnât matter.
If someone offer us 75m to get Odegaard and we sell him.
Do we count him as Arsenal ârejectâ? Or âunwantedâ??
It is not that straight forward.
I see Ozil as a âsurplusâ.
Correct me if I am wrong, Chelsea never put Kai on transfer list.
Arsenal just offered the amountt that Chelsea took.
1 Like
If we sell Odegaard yes it means heâs a reject as far as weâre concerned because weâd surely be selling to either upgrade or because of a loss of faith in the player.
Only if someone makes an offer we canât refuse is there some nuance, selling for ÂŁ150m? Yeah maybe not
Youâre arguing semantics, Madueke was unwanted, a cast off, an asset no longer needed or whastever else you want to call it but at its heart its the same shit really
As you all know, English is not my first language.
the word ârejectâ, my understanding is, there is a ânegativeâ meaning implied.
Okay now that Iâve relaxed. I still think this deal is still terrible but I hope he proves me an absolute mug for doubting him.
Anyway this Chelsea reject thing. I donât think heâs a reject, Chelsea saw an opportunity to cash in and took it. For some reason it just had to be us, but that doesnât make him a reject.
Also, one of their best forwardsâŚyeah this is the context that Chelsea are mediocre and barely got in the Champions League over Forest, doesnât mean much.
2 Likes
https://x.com/ZachLowy/status/1943734666093068563
Spoiling the club announcement, what a bald dick.
1 Like