Arsenal transfers 25/26

Even Newcastle can attract better players than we can now. Have we lost our ability to attract top talent? I think so.

How can they? They got rejected by players who’d join Arsenal in a heart beat lol

They even got rejected by our former manager

1 Like

The entire value of the like-for-like comparison is that it might help control for situations in which you’ve played a particularly soft or hard portion of your schedule in aggregate. So its useful, say, when you’ve played eight matches because maybe those eight represented a very hard run or a very easy stretch.

When you’ve played half the season then you’ve basically played a representative schedule by definition, as you’ve played every team once and a roughly equal number of home and away fixtures. You might have played Wolves away rather than Wolves home in the previous season, but that’s balanced out by, for example, having played Villa home rather than Villa away. The aggregate schedule strength is all that matters in the end and the aggregate of a half season this year and a half season last year is going to be roughly equal.

1 Like

Weren’t we in from Bruno Guimaraes? Newcastle even trolling us in their video reveals

We never challenge for the League and it’s over a decade since we even got past round 1 of the CL.

6 Likes

He joined Newcastle because we didn’t put a bid in to sign him not because Newcastle are more attractive

1 Like

That’s probably because you still have hope that Edu/Arteta we will get it right. :arteta:

We didn’t even bid for him

I think it was a video of Guimaraes’s team. On twitter the consensus seems to be that his agent (a certain Kia J.) may be behind this.

Nor do 14 odd other teams in the league. A host of those teams still attract good players.

If anyone thinks playing at Arsenal in London in the Premier League on good money, is not attractive, then I don’t know what to say.

Players we bought this season although some turning out decent are not elite targets.
The other factor in getting them bigger clubs were not bidding against us.
Bottom line we need them bigger targets and London isn’t an ace like it was 20 years ago either or being undefeated in 2004.
It’s all about relevance.

1 Like

We signed those shitters because we had terrible recruitment and no vision.

In the years from 2015-2019 we could easily have been competitive for players like Mane, Salah, Son, Grealish, etc. We had a legitimate chance at Kante and wouldn’t pay the agent fees. Instead, we spent 200m on Xhaka, Mustafi, Laca, and Pepe.

Whether we have the right people in charge now is a huge question. But a club like Arsenal can absolutely find and attract great players if we get the recruitment right.

5 Likes

You’ve still done nothing, in my opinion, to convince me that the measure in that tweet is less representative than your measure of 21 games. Neither are perfect but yours seem worse and less balanced.

That’s not necessarily true. You’re assuming it’ll be balanced out, but that’s absolutely not a fact that it will.

1 Like

Same here.
Although we are all bewildered by how we are left with handful of players but are we really going to lose sleep over Chambers, Kolasinac etc.

We only have two shit players now in Cedric and Xhaka who we need to get rid somehow.

At least we won’t be distracted in summer trying to offload shit ton of shitty players like we did in last few windows.

But on the other hand, the amount of critical incoming have increased.

Backup CB, Back up RB, First Choice Midfielder, Back up Midfielder, Winger, 2 Strikers.

2 Likes

Alright, I don’t think we’re going to convince the other. But I do acknowledge that “fundamentally stupid” may have been too strong. Arsenal gets us all a little heated at times…

1 Like

All good mate :grinning:

1 Like

Why would any decent player be attracted to us rather than Man City, Man U, Chelsea, Liverpool, spurs, Aston Villa, West Ham, Newcastle, as well as several decent European sides.

What do we have to offer that these other clubs couldn’t?

We don’t have good decision makers.
We don’t have an ambitious board.
We don’t have any world class players.
We don’t have a proper manager.
We don’t play in Europe.
We’re a club on the slide.

We’ll see in the next window what players we can attract.
I think you might be surprised how difficult it will be and what we end up with.

1 Like

If you can’t see why we’re definitely more attractive than these three then I don’t think anyone will likely have success in explaining it to you haha.

I’d have been on board with your post if you hadn’t gone as far as to name these three clubs lol (I would have questioned Spurs too, but that’s less notable than these three and more understandable)

3 Likes

We spend a lot of money for a club that doesn’t have an ambitious board lol

2 Likes

We may not have players lining up to join us but there are handful of big more attractive clubs than us and thousands of decent players out there.

We shouldn’t have trouble finding gems who are not being sought after by other big outfits.

None of Ramsdale, Odegaard, White, Gabriel, Tomiyasu were hyped with offers.

The latter two show that we can find really good bargains.

2 Likes