The entire value of the like-for-like comparison is that it might help control for situations in which youâve played a particularly soft or hard portion of your schedule in aggregate. So its useful, say, when youâve played eight matches because maybe those eight represented a very hard run or a very easy stretch.
When youâve played half the season then youâve basically played a representative schedule by definition, as youâve played every team once and a roughly equal number of home and away fixtures. You might have played Wolves away rather than Wolves home in the previous season, but thatâs balanced out by, for example, having played Villa home rather than Villa away. The aggregate schedule strength is all that matters in the end and the aggregate of a half season this year and a half season last year is going to be roughly equal.
Players we bought this season although some turning out decent are not elite targets.
The other factor in getting them bigger clubs were not bidding against us.
Bottom line we need them bigger targets and London isnât an ace like it was 20 years ago either or being undefeated in 2004.
Itâs all about relevance.
We signed those shitters because we had terrible recruitment and no vision.
In the years from 2015-2019 we could easily have been competitive for players like Mane, Salah, Son, Grealish, etc. We had a legitimate chance at Kante and wouldnât pay the agent fees. Instead, we spent 200m on Xhaka, Mustafi, Laca, and Pepe.
Whether we have the right people in charge now is a huge question. But a club like Arsenal can absolutely find and attract great players if we get the recruitment right.
Youâve still done nothing, in my opinion, to convince me that the measure in that tweet is less representative than your measure of 21 games. Neither are perfect but yours seem worse and less balanced.
Thatâs not necessarily true. Youâre assuming itâll be balanced out, but thatâs absolutely not a fact that it will.
Same here.
Although we are all bewildered by how we are left with handful of players but are we really going to lose sleep over Chambers, Kolasinac etc.
We only have two shit players now in Cedric and Xhaka who we need to get rid somehow.
At least we wonât be distracted in summer trying to offload shit ton of shitty players like we did in last few windows.
But on the other hand, the amount of critical incoming have increased.
Backup CB, Back up RB, First Choice Midfielder, Back up Midfielder, Winger, 2 Strikers.
Alright, I donât think weâre going to convince the other. But I do acknowledge that âfundamentally stupidâ may have been too strong. Arsenal gets us all a little heated at timesâŚ
Why would any decent player be attracted to us rather than Man City, Man U, Chelsea, Liverpool, spurs, Aston Villa, West Ham, Newcastle, as well as several decent European sides.
What do we have to offer that these other clubs couldnât?
We donât have good decision makers.
We donât have an ambitious board.
We donât have any world class players.
We donât have a proper manager.
We donât play in Europe.
Weâre a club on the slide.
Weâll see in the next window what players we can attract.
I think you might be surprised how difficult it will be and what we end up with.
If you canât see why weâre definitely more attractive than these three then I donât think anyone will likely have success in explaining it to you haha.
Iâd have been on board with your post if you hadnât gone as far as to name these three clubs lol (I would have questioned Spurs too, but thatâs less notable than these three and more understandable)