Undertaker way too high. Great servant but his impact is pretty whatever.
His criteria is too loaded making this list wonky. Is Cena above Rock because he was around longer? Even though he was getting boos for 70% of it despite being a face? Does Hogan’s lack of wrestling really outweigh literally everything else to drag him to 10th? What makes Reigns 13th? That Vince liked him? What puts Rey over Eddie Guerrero?
Those lists are impossible to write. Everybody’s criteria is different and completely subjective. Objectively, I know Bruno Sammartino is a massive part of wrestling history, but he wouldn’t make anything like the top 10 for me because I’ve never watched a single match of his.
However, Ric Flair being 24th amuses me because at some point he’ll see that and he’ll be seething about it.
The only reason I can think of Flair being that low is they’re basing off his time in WWE, which compared to NWA/WCW, he did next to nothing with. Only held 2 world titles out of 16 in WWE.
Personally, I think it’s an unfair comment from Triple H. Tony is offering these guys ridiculous money to pretty much work part-time.
The dream of wrestling for WWE can wait. In Will’s case, I don’t think he even has that Wrestlemania dream. Dude was a TNA diehard. I think he likes working for the “alternative” company.
He’ll probably main event All In later this year at Wembley which must be pretty neat for an Englishman like him.
Worst case scenario, AEW goes under in a year or two, I reckon WWE would still be interested in him if that happens.