Thomas Partey (5)

50/50 on that van cunt was ok

I think a professional footballer can often deal with booing, may even take encouragement from it.

Are you agreeing or disagreeing?

She has mentioned a civil suit. Would this be related to the NDA and the 100k she got paid?

What? Consent not being constant or permanent if anything backs up my point about it being necessary to have explicit consent for sexual acts, and if anything contradicts what you said about various partners giving you carte blanche to commit sexual acts on them while they sleep.

If consent isn’t constant and people change their mind (your words), then presumably you’d need to gain consent on every occasion?

I’m genuinely at a loss as to what point you were trying to make here.

1 Like

Sexual chemistry and consent are not synonymous terms, my post makes perfect sense.

2 Likes

He’ll be starting tomorrow I’m sure…

1 Like

Currently spewing a timeline, not sure it makes any difference what they did in the lead up, maybe she will get there. But maybe she should stop the message dump (largely irrelevant). Link the legislation change and show the verdict of the civil suite she mentions…

Clearly the police haven’t charged and so the legislation change and civil suit are likely most relevant to the trial by public opinion that is being conducted

Yeah she’s really dragging the story out. Chatting about how the food on the boat was horrible so she didn’t eat anything. Yeah that’s obviously a reason for her getting drunk quicker, but it’s not really relevant to the story and it’s not anyone else’s fault if she made the decision to go hungry.

3 Likes

This. I don’t understand what she’s getting at.
ā€œOh, we fought, and we weren’t talking to each other. He came by to check if I wanted something to eat or drink.ā€
Ok girl, thanks for painting him a good guy here. :rofl:

She’s essentially muddying up her story with irrelevant shit. I stopped reading her tweets. Someone will probably do a roundup. :man_shrugging:

My timeline is filled with people wishing death on Partey and him to be jailed immediately. Then there are others who have analyzed the evidence she provided and found some suspect messages from her.
Big mess.

They are if you are dating someone.
I doubt you sat down with your wife, negotiated on a checklist of dos & don’ts and signed on dotted lines.

  • Allowed to slap butt
  • Allowed to grab dick
  • Allowed to cuddle when asleep
  • Allowed to touch while asleep
  • Allowed to squeeze boobs while chatting

They are never explicitly consented for and it is within your bonding as partners you would know what is acceptable & what is not.

7 Likes

It’s called relationship dynamics. Consent is not a thing prevalent in relationships.

Most men don’t ask for sex in a relationship the same thing with women.

I was confused initially. This is the incident that occurred in 2021.

Here’s the legislation loophole I believe she is referring to… @SRCJJ @Bavin. The timeline fits, but obviously I have no way of explaining this. Thoughts @Joshua ?

Seems to be two extremes. Some people are saying Partey should be in a jail. While others have gone completely the other way and are accusing the woman of lying while saying ā€œI stand by Partey.ā€

The truth is usually somewhere in between. Too hard to make a judgement call either way.

12 Likes

Yeah this is super messy

Yeah, I found these so weird. A good reflection of society today being to reactionary and tribalistic tbh.

1 Like

:grimacing:.

Basically if it’s being investigated in another jurisdiction then the courts can’t do anything, however it still can be investigated on the merits of it.

This law just extends the power of the sexual abuse act, it doesn’t diminish it

1 Like

Sexual chemistry and consent are literally not synonymous terms. Sexual chemistry is about attraction and how you vibe with another individual (in general but also in bed), that is not what consent means. You can have sexual chemistry and that does not mean consent for any sort of sexual act has been given.

Two people being mutually attracted to each other is not the same as either party giving consent to have sexual acts committed against them while they are asleep/unconscious.

There is also a world of difference between your bullet points and trying to have sex with someonewhile they are asleep, tryingi have sex with someonewhile they are unconscious is a whole different ball game.

1 Like

Personally even if someone explicitly tells you you can force yourself on them because they find it a turn on or whatever it’s still stupid as fuck to follow up on that. Especially in this day and age the risk even in that scenario is enormous.