Don’t think it’s the majority. Give it 10 years and you’ll probably be waxing lyrical over Ozil after he’s left the club
1 Like
Nah. You’re just wrong here man…
1 Like
Nope. Fabregas was the guy for me. Özil is just a great player we signed. No comparison
Your opinion.
Yeah. Fabregas was the guy. The guy who dropped his head when things weren’t going so well.
1 Like
Also, without any real doubt, a majority one.
There’s a definite doubt
Seriously lol, I couldn’t tell you but that it comes with a certificate must mean its pretty legit.
But I have no experience of these things 
1 Like
When Theo was good he was really good. Just such a shame there wasn’t more of it.
2 Likes
That’s why I highlighted the 3 years he had of relative health during his prime years. He was only 23 when he suffered a major knee injury. Most of that inconsistency later on in his career can be chalked up to a major lower leg injury and constant niggling injuries thereafter.
Hear you man, it’s not a knock on Theo, it’s a lament that it just wasn’t meant to be.
2 Likes
Theo didn’t have the desire or commitment to be an elite player.
He was predictable once you came to terms with his pace and teams and coaches worked him out.
He wasnt and he didnt challenge himself too be better. Im of the opinion that he was one of the main players who let Wenger down and or exposed his approach to getting the best out of players limited as the game changed in his second decade here.
2 Likes
Bollocks. Cesc was the fucking heartbeat of the team for years. Get yer head out yer arse!
7 mins for 7 years.
Sounds about right for his contribution
1 Like
Played for the club with a broken leg…I don’t need any more confirmation regarding his commitment.
1 Like
This the same guy who said the other team wanted it more than us.
He’s talking about Fabregas mate which is confusing with it being Walcott’s thread haha
1 Like
Thanks. Apologies @Trion
Hey, this is no place to discuss my love life
6 Likes
When one puts bare bones stats and another comes back with this, it’s kinda madness to call the other thing revisionism. This^^ is revisionist. The reality is that:
He wasn’t inconsistent during this time period. He was producing at an absolutely world class level. No one said he was a great dribbler or had much value outside of the final third (he wasn’t, he didn’t). But you don’t have to if you’re producing that kind of end product.
2 Likes