That fat vile cunt Boris is who served braverman up to us.
Bastard
1 Like
Lineker got emotional about the abhorrent, desperate government position to get the votes of the dwindling number of racist grandads in the electorate.
So the Tories start a witch-hunt in order to silence opposition to their own misinformation about the threat caused to natives by those of different ethnic backgrounds.
Thus further validating Lineker’s comparison in the first place.
6 Likes
Oh no stopping unknown people entering your country illegally that may do illegal things, harm citizens, syphon money from tax payers and bring nothing to your country is so racist….
90%+ are young men which pose/are a threat to women, girls and boys.
You people are deluded, it’s all good wanting this shit when it has no affect to you.
1 Like
That’s several incorrect conclusions you’ve jumped to, along with providing incorrect statistical data.
Keep going, I’ve got all night.
2 Likes
We believe in freedom of speech, unless you say something we don’t like.
1 Like
Left wing publications. Pretending it’s not a problem doesn’t stop it from being a problem
There have been many incidents here( just last month with riots it provoked in Liverpool) and in Europe that has shown it has been a growing problem, again pretending it’s not true doesn’t make false.
1 Like
1 Like
Migration Watch is an anti-migration watchdog, which is fine, but their figures don’t match the official figures. I’m neither left or right and I wouldn’t read the Independent anyway. I’m not denying that a majority are male.
Why are they mostly male you might have asked yourself? I assume you’re the kind of guy who’d prefer to send your wife or children off to try to earn a living to get you out of poverty.
There’s a problem with how we deal with legal migrants, legal asylum seekers and there’s also a huge problem with imports and exports. Our borders are chaotic, our Border Forces have gone from stopping illegal crossing to checking paperwork for Frozen Peas. Brexit was supposed to fix this, not make it worse.
What won’t get this resolved is the hideous, abhorrent rhetoric that stirs up hate. I get very angry when my grandads fought in WWII to crush fascism only to find that it’s alive and well in the UK 80 years later.
That it’s done as some sort of show of patriotism further insults all of our forces who served in that long, devasting struggle against an anti-migrant, anti-minorities fascistic despot.
So the questions I love to ask in these situations:
*How do you propose the UK processes legal applications for asylum and where should that process take place?
*A family member once said “If I win the lottery, I’m moving to Spain to get away from all these foreigners that are flooding into Britain”. Fair play, he sold his company and moved there, but do you see any contradiction in that statement?
3 Likes
That the most delusional statement ever, it shows you have no idea what fascism is. For we should gate people breaking in to our country posing a threaten to women and children, and sucking money away from people that actually need it.
These are usually processed why the application is made, if the person is another country of temporary refuge once the green light is given the person gets escorted to the U.K.
Mean’s absolutely nothing, but I will not; white British demographics are shrinking year on year in 30-40 years white British might not even be the majority.
Most of the guys are 18-35 unmarried, acquaintances have made here a publicised the free money their get, they treat a like a damn adventure and actually document the journey on tic toc. You are being highly charitable to scum that would rob steal and kill you if it pays.
We are talking about illegal migrants, ever county knows how to deal with legal migration, why are you mixing the two???
Simple question from me @mhappy do you think this bill will work?
3 Likes
Is that BBC impartiality and balance at play there???
Sure, one side will factually criticise Stanley Johnson by saying that he broke his wife’s nose, but in the interests of balance, friends of his have emphasised that it only happened once.
Did we really need the additional context?!?!
You couldn’t have that panel member say something unambiguously negative about him without contextualising it, Fiona?!
2 Likes
Things only work if everyone is on board, at the moment the civil servants aren’t onboard with the bill so no it will not work.
Yeah what a shit cunt move by Fiona Bruce.
That’s blatant breaking of impartiality, adding extra sympathy for an act of wifebeating
2 Likes
Well no, that’s what impartiality looks like.
But there are some things that we shouldn’t be impartial about, and beating up your wife should be one of those events.
Impartiality isn’t taking the middle view to everything.
It’s reporting the facts without any added spin.
It’s a fact that Stanley Johnson broke his wife’s nose.
Bruce saying, ‘oh it only happened once’ is said to spin that to make it sound better.
2 Likes
Right, but it is a fact that he only did it once. At least as far as we know anyway.
I don’t see that as spin, rather the BBC’s desire to always be balanced and neutral.
But that added fact wasn’t really necessary because nowhere had anyone said he had beaten his wife more than once.
‘he has beaten his wife’
‘but he has beaten his wife ONLY once’
That’s spin to me
2 Likes
Trying to make a wife beater look better is what impartiality looks like. Gotcha.
The woman spoke the truth, there was precisely no need for Bruce to add that he apparently only did it once, because nobody even implied he’d broken her nose multiple times, fuck are you on about lol
1 Like
We all agree that she shouldn’t have said that. It was completely unnecessary.
The fuck are you on about?
1 Like