Most likely, although he’s on the cusp of 35 now so it’ll have to end at some point.
Thiem out 1st rd 
Zverev taken to 5 sets also
This is the tennis thread. You can’t just post F1 stuff without any context 
Speaking of which Max Mosely died. His dad was a massive cunt eh.
2 Likes
Golden 
1 Like
Why you replying in the tennis thread? Be fun at Wimbledon when you’re asking what Love means.
1 Like
It’s a reply to this awful, awkward interview poor Serena had to do in the Monaco GP after Max won.
Don’t think it’ll last much longer but nice to see Federer in the 2nd week at the French Open.
Hopefully Nadal cements himself as the greatest ever by winning this tournament next week
Still not sure he’ll go down as the greatest ever with such a high % of the slams being on clay.
2 Likes
That’s exactly the reason why.
Sheer dominance on clay and he’s won all the others.
Nah, relying so much on clay isn’t so good.
Far too heavily weighted on that surface, greatest on clay perhaps but the greatest ever shouldn’t have to rely on playing on a single surface so much IMO
1 Like
Greatest on clay isn’t even a debate
1 Like
Haha, yeah and that’s fair enough.
If him and Djokovic end up on the same amount of slams or even if its very close then I’d say its Djokovic.
1 Like
Agree Djokovic would have more variety and also the most year end no 1 and most weeks at no 1 and better head to head vs Rafa and Fed.
1 Like
And yet he’s won all the others.
The 21 slams he can win by the end of this week is inclusive of them. Puts him ahead of Fed (who won’t win another) and 3 ahead of the Novak Gamesmanship Djokovic
Look at how much of the others he’s won though.
He dominated one surface more than he didn’t the rest. He hasn’t beaten Djokovic on a hard court slam in like 7 years or something. Greatest ever?