Hmm yes those famously blue eyes blond haired Scandinavian child brides
![]()
Deporting foreign criminals is simply what other countries so wonât find disagreement there.
Not sure about revoking citizenship. Feels a bit slippery slope to me and it wouldnât stop there. Iâd rather making getting citizenship âharderâ as an alternative.
Probably reasoning that white Europeans wouldnât naturally care about black girls from Africa being forced into marriage, so chose an image more likely to get a favourable response.
I think they know their audience tbh.
You 1000% could not trust a British government with the right to strip citizenship in such cases. Straight on the road to every benefits claimant in the country being informed they have some tenuous link to Bangladesh or Rwanda and need to be deported there.
I thought the threshold set out in the Shamima Begum case was very low for a natural born British citizen. I donât think there was any evidence of her doing any criminal acts whilst in Syria? The basis for revoking her citizenship seems based on distaste more than anything despite her being a victim herself. Weâll see what the ECHR sayâŚ
Iâm fully in favour a denaturalising people but I see the issues with essentially having a two tier citizenship in practice.
Plenty of eyewitness statements from the areas she was staying in of the stuff she was doing, including from her own husband and others as well as her own admission. The intel on her was pretty impressive.
@Leper - maybe, or the UN didnât want to be seen picking on/discriminating against the actual ethnicities that engage with child marriage so itâs easier to just use an illustration of a blond girl and act like itâs a problem for white majority countries too.
I donât think the two things would be mutually exclusive. Both could have been factors as to why the message was put across with that image.
I was also add that when it comes to safeguarding children, getting into a mindset as a society that a form of harm happens to one group of children but it isnât a problem for another is exactly the kind of space in which child abusers thrive.
Gunner89 is a lunatic. Comes across as an internet character, who has either never been to Dublin or Islington, or is hyper exaggerating his/her/their/its experience there.
England has not only lost its cultural identity, but also its backbone. There is a distinct lack of national pride and the country only really seems to unite during major sporting occasions - as long as you do not wave that flag!
Yes, technically, there is no such thing as an English person, the ancestors of most are Norman, Roman, Scandinavian or Celt. There is also no such thing as an English passport. However, there used to be an English culture here. I didnât grow up in an English household but grew up on a predominantly, white-English estate and could see clear cultural differences. These differences were respected. Being Jamaican helped because at least in a city, this carried a weird kudos
Immigration is out of control, this is coming from the child of immigrants, and the fact that the church (and even pub) culture has near enough disappeared is an abomination.
The idea of blaming some of societies failures on elderly south Asians is nuts: rich corporations and their leaders pose more problems. However, for the first time, I almost sympathise with somebody who is English and wants to show national pride.
I work in Primary Schools. The lowest achieving group for nearly two decades have been working-class, white boys. They have now been overtaken - by working class, white girls. When I say white, I donât mean Polish by the way, I mean British. Country is a mess.
To answer this question. This would never happen in modern day Jamaica. Although we are slowly becoming a Chinese colony, not ethnically but politically and infrastructure wise.
Iâm not talking about Chinese Jamaicans, who fully identify with the culture. I mean Chinese development and businesses.
Good lord.
Reform, like them or otherwise, are no longer a joke. They have acquired seats and traction.
Theyâve got no chance of being elected but their political power is growing sharply.
I think itâs good timing from the cunts after Labour got embarrassed over the May elections yesterday to announce their âshadow cabinetâ.
Especially since it might get more Reform voters engaged with the importance of Mayâs elections.
Some of the really thick ones may even think this is the build up to the GE.
Johnson/Truss tribute act. I donât really envy a man who has to justify huge levels of state spending whilst pretending there are infinite âsavingsâ in cutting welfare and foreign aid. Its going to be ugly when, inevitably the figures donât match up ![]()
Although Reform wonât win an election, they will split the vote between them and the Tories, which will make it very close and might help Labour but whatever happens, the whole political system is in a mess.
Labour have shifted so far away from what theyâre supposed to be, which was helping the lower paid and the self employed, that they are seen as a party for the Liberal elite.
So rather than making working class people poorer and blaming them for the problems, perhaps they might consider listening to them, which might stop them voting Reform.
Jenrick is a sex scandal waiting to happen isnât he?
That surname alone is ripe for use in a tabloid headline.
Think heâs too vanilla for anything like that
I think itâll be a porn thing, maybe on a work laptop or something that he accidentally shows on a slideshow during a speech.
I canât imagine him being very confident at IRL relationships.
So weâre just labelling Reform MPs as wrong wronguns without evidence? Fuck it, I reckon heâs impartial to beastiality and animal porn.
To be honest, that is unfair of OA. After all, Reform would never make unfounded negative insinuations about a group of people.


