Noni Madueke

Yeah, I don’t want him but that’s a bit too much.

Wait they’re trying to make it viral? Fuck me why is everything about social media so lame.

Twitter marks think Arteta and Berta will see it if it gets trending and say my bad lads, we’ll stop the move.

One thing I will say is that while I’m not sold on Madueke people really need to get over the buying from Chelsea thing. Their crazy player trading business model means they’re desperate for sales and there is plenty of opportunity to get good deals.

-Havertz has been a good transfer for us and his price looks very reasonable today.
-Kovacic was a great deal for City.
-Jorginho was a great buy for us at the price.
-Pulisic ended up a very good buy for Milan.
-Gallagher has been a good buy for Atletico.
-Hall has been a great buy for Newcastle.

4 Likes

That Sterling deal scarred people.

6 Likes

Sterling was absolute shit but it was a loan and they paid most of his wages.

2 Likes

I want to say in agreement, the buying Chelsea rejects thing is absolutely overexaggerated.

But this one definitely qualifies as throwing them a bone. I don’t like it.

1 Like

Did we not sign Garcia so we can save funds to purchase Madueke for reported £50m? Lol.

1 Like

https://x.com/insidethecannon/status/1942986995082629173?s=46

conclude the window with the acquisition of Mosquera from Valencia with no further business expected

Good thing I believe almost all of these guys are talking out of their arse, or I would be shook.

4 Likes

Insidethecannon needs to shove the cannon up his arse

6 Likes

Same TheAFCBell imposter that lied about Sesko. Yeah, totally buying. Definitely not ragebaiting to get a bunch of clicks from angry gooners.

Conversations with Madueke convinced Arteta that he was the solution for LW?

Either Madueke is the most persuasive man alive or Arteta is a lot stupider than we all thought.

(Or this dude is a fraud)

4 Likes

Conversation between Arteta and Madueke:

A: I’m looking at you as a cover for Saka.
M: But I’m the best LW this planet has ever seen.
A: Sounds about right. I’m convinced. Sign him for 50 million pounds.

4 Likes

By some distance too. Spurs are landing the better winger at a slightly higher price… in 2025.

Deal stinks of bullshit. Who buys bench players at 50m when they still have shite starting?

1 Like

If he really is inside a cannon, someone needs to light the fuse.

1 Like

Does it have to be football related though? Is there no way Boehly can pay Kroenke back through some other business?

Then why by all appearances is Arsenal meeting their reported valuation of the player?

Arsenal seem to be negotiating this deal similar to the Havertz one—where they have no leverage and the selling club isn’t desperate.

Shit is beyond old seeing their cast offs end up here.

Let me guess on some sort of minutes-to-goal ratio? Because I’m pretty sure Saka has as many if not more goals than Havertz.

Half our team, the front half, is shit. Havertz, Trossard and Martinelli are squad players.

You’re getting into wacky territory now, but yes, I guess it is technically possible.

Since Boehly has owned them we’ve bought Havertz Jorginho and Kepa from them and loaned Sterling from them, and now maybe we’ll sign Madueke too. Doesn’t seem like a solid basis for a conspiracy theory in my book.

1 Like