Won’t be much of a fair trial if it ends up in court.
The only clear case of someone getting raleroaded by shadowy powers via false sexual assault allegations is Julian Assange.
You sir, are no Julian Assange.
Ivermectin has been approved for human use since 1987.
It will either have some efficacy (I suspect it will have, but only in the early stages of the disease), or it wont.
Maybe there’s a civil suit against him also.
1 Like
He didn’t use ivermectin for farm animals. He used the one for humans.
I didn’t get vaccinated. Got covid twice and I am still here.
That too was a bonkers power play and the mass media fucking served it right into everyone’s veins.
My point is. The MSM absolutely is making orchestrated pushes of news at times. The Depp stuff was astonishing. The day after the trial was concluded I posted here 5/6 different news outlets publishing exactly the same stuff. Excusing Heard and even claiming to believe her. It was revolting.
Same with other news it’s narrative would simultaneously be pushed out by (western) media across the globe.
1 Like
There is only one version as far as I am aware. It’s just one of those medicines that can be tolerated by both animals, and us. Like Ketamine.
It was never a drug just intended for animals.
That said, Ivermectin is not the answer for COVID either
Maybe my bullshit-o-meter was going off and I got distracted. I heard the bit where he said “I will be denying these allegations” rather than “I am denying”. I probably switched off after that so well done for making it to the end.
Filth
According to this I don’t think humans get the same one as animals.
Your inside is 
1 Like
Make sure you don’t breed.
Interesting. I wonder what they have to do to it to make it tolerable by humans.
Why in Gods name is covid a topic being discussed in 2023? If anyone posts a graph there will be consequences.
2 Likes
The problem is that joe rogan is a multimillionaire that can afford it and followed along with much of the right wing news media to push ivermectin—knowing fully well 99.99% percent of his audience can’t afford it and will go to pet stores to buy the animal version that will make them shit their guts out.
That’s the power Media has over general populace. They convinced everyone that Ivermectin is animal medication and not the drug that cured night blindness 30 years ago among humans.
And then they wonder why there is a general mistrust & fear mongering.
Isn’t that illegal? Unless you have connections, it’s not easy to get hold of veterinary medication.
Plus Ivermectin is dirt cheap
Why do you think this Brand issue is orchestrated reporting, rather than it just being a case of the media all reporting on a sensational story that will drive traffic to their sites? This sort of thing is big news, seems only logical that every outlet will be trying to get their share of the traffic, because that is what their entire business is built upon. That seems like the simpler, more obvious conclusion, rather than thinking there’s some sort of conspiracy against him.
He’s relevant on youtube with his millions of followers, but he isn’t a particularly relevant figure in the UK any more. Most people I know don’t have a clue what he has been up to in recent years, and I think that goes for the majority of normies who aren’t terminally online. I don’t get why The Times and Channel 4 would be desperate to bring him down by telling lies.
Especially as he has shown he will be litigious if lies are told about him, given he sued The Sun for saying he cheated on his Jemima Khan when they were an item. That was relatively minor, yet he sued, and won, so surely he’d do the same now if they were making up all of these very, very serious lies about him?
1 Like
I believe Brand until proven guilty.
Joe Rogan is not right wing.
2 Likes