That kind of information is out there already, I don’t see the value in me regurgitating it here tbh. Obviously, like how I have an issue with the Independent, I’m sure you’ll have doubts about data presented by pro brexit outlets reporting on subjective “benefits”.
I’ve always said measuring the impact of brexit cannot be reduced to binary pro and cons especially if we’re having a discussion about complex things like international trade, regulation or wider economic performance. Its also not a discussion that can be reasonably had with very limited short term data.
If people want to acknowledgement that the period following the withdrawal has not been advantageous/beneficial to the UK, then OK fair enough any reasonable person would concede that. No one ever said there would be no impact and detriment to the UK following departure of a political and economic union.
Even then context is required because its an objective fact that the impact of leaving is not as severe as original projected and the scope for the UK to level up outside of the EU is more than viable.
I think primary issue the UK faces are not tied to Brexit at all. There’s so much we can do with deregulation and planning reform that would turbo charge growth, Labour have made some good noises on that, lets see if they execute
I think alot of people need to drop the reductive view on the impact of Brexit and see thing in a more fluid way.