All this chat and no actual news. FFS OA.
He would be another player scoring around your 15 league goals type mark, remember its highly unlikely Arsenal will be awarded 10 penalties.
Better than Giroud, but would really improve us?
You thought 28 posts was news???
Come on, youāre more experienced than that :mustafi:
[quote=āCraigie, post:768, topic:184ā]
You thought 28 posts was news???
Come on, youāre more experienced than that
[/quote]Even when we had 100 new posts in the Mahrez thread last Summer, we had no actual news :coq:
Classic OA.
I mean, we are a discussion board not a news outlet lol.
Tell that to Luca
@discobot fortune do most of us on OA talk a load of pish?
EDIT:
Hmm. How did discobot give out a like?
Without a doubt
Ceefax from Italy still makes me laugh.
Honestly, watching videos of Lacazette I really donāt see the need to spend Ā£60m on him. He doesnāt do anything different than Walcott - heās just a poacher with pace and positioning just like Walcott, except he gets to take penalties which pad out his stats.
Heās been averaging something 8-10 penalty goals for the last several seasons.
35 % of his league goals last term came from the spot
Iād rather go get Costa.
Despite the penalty goals he still scored at .67 npg90 IIRC, Belotti managed .7.
If we could persuade Chelsea to sell him to us that would be a lot better than Lacazette.
Costa is a top striker who is experienced in the PL and who has that winning mentality that a lot of our attacking players, apart from Sanchez, lack.
Maybe we can pick up John Terry too so I can make full use of that sick bucket
Yeah letās buy a guy who got outmuscled by a 17 year old in the Ajax game.
He is a good player but nowhere good enough for Arsenal. Rather stick with Giroud then.
Iāll have a large cappuccino and a cheese and tomato toastie , top man
As legitimate as that point isā¦ dropping stats like that is a really good way to wind people up nowadays
Aulas saying āWe have a very good bid from Arsenalā is he telling the truth?