Yea I basically agree. And presumably the designers did exactly that at some point. How they end up with something like this is beyond me.
I agree with this but I think itās very likely to look much more polished and crisp as an actual shirt rather than the image weāre seeing.
Itāll look especially shit once you put the sponsor on itā¦ having the sponsor, Adidas logo and club crest all centred on the shirt wonāt look good.
Hot Take: I love it. After the monstrosity of the Chevy logo and some absolutely god awful sublimated patterns this looks good in comparison.
Obviously theyāre going to put a shirt sponsor on there which could make or break the whole thing. Iām a big proponent of brands using wordmarks only because I think the logo plus a wordmark gets cluttered.
Weāll see, but if adidas flipped the logo to the old trefoil and slapped a retro cannon on that it would sell out in seconds.
Iād bet on it selling even better if they put the cannon on one side and the trefoil logo on the other.
It just comes down to preference, but for me itās always going to look better not having both in the middle but instead in their traditional positions. Even more so when we factor in that youāve then got the main sponsor directly beneath both if them.
pretendstobeshocked.jpeg
FYI, this is a concept kit thatās doing the rounds on Twitter.
Im in awe of the 3D modelling of it all. The badge, the text on the shirt, just incredible work. Will have taken forever.
I like itā¦
Thatās tremendous. Itās a fourth kit, theyāre probably never going to wear it unless Nike demands it. Very 1990s for me, but in a good way.
Itās different, not sure iād wear it personally but i can see it being a hit.
I like it would definitely rock that. Is that out already or a leak for next season?
Could work as a goalkeeperās kit.
Well thatās just wrong.
Cmon Strolls! Itās art.
Lots of art is shite though.
^ literally!