Watkins would be the most pointless signing, we needed him in Jan and not now (we could have done with an actual striker for the psg matches) and you never know we could have made the final? Watkins is not needed now as we need the tier above him
So what you guys saying is that you’d rather Jackson over Watkins. I hear it to be honest, it’s a good shout. 
The real issue is that, it’s come down to Jackson vs Watkins.
But we’re joking about that, right?
When we’re signing duds like Madueke, it begs the question: are we really joking?
2 Likes
He’s really not a dud lmao.
Lets just make shit up why not.
Some of the replies from the intelligent folks on here really makes me fear for the future of mankind.
1 Like
The way some people go on about Madueke is ridiculous 
Give it a rest ffs
50/60m fee. 5 years 40/50m wages. +Agent bollocks.
Dramatic reporting.
Edit: Yep
Finance expert Stefan Borson exclusively told Football Insider Newcastle would have to pay £50million to sign the 29-year-old and offer him a £50million contract.
3 Likes
To English football this one goes
https://x.com/SkySportsPL/status/1948454489255813141?t=dYkoelpses9u4wVWSjmerA&s=19
They already have the clown duo of Hojlund and Zirkzee, makes sense they would finally try for someone that has an actual history of scoring goals.
Not that it matters since they will still have Amorim as manager.
Would be a top discount signing for United.
Surprising garnacho has any market tbh
Serviceable and that’s about their level
Would barely paper over the cracks
Apparently the alternative was Calvert Lewin
Cunha, Mbuemo and Watkins could be a decent trio
Watkins, Mbuemo and Cunha should be enough to maintain their status as a mid table club, although their defence, midfield and GK, won’t make it easy.