Fekir for 30M or the FIFA merchant Zaha for 80m?
Get this guy
Fekir for 30M or the FIFA merchant Zaha for 80m?
Get this guy
On board with that. Zaha is pure crazy talk for 80.
Aulas not extracting maximum value for a top player?
Heās crocked. Avoid
Liverpool said no for a reason. Ticking time bomb.
Straight swap for Mustafi?
Heās got a year left on his deal, besides most likely another ITK spouting the usual.
He clocks up a good amount of games per season tbh, for arguments sake if that figure was genuine heās more than worth the punt.
Heād instantly be our most technical and dynamic attacker if he signed. You do worry why the price tag is low if that Twitter account is to be believed. Even in the last year of his contract heās still worth a lot more than EUR 30M - it could only be that low if the player has significant injury issues
Liverpool must have found a serious injury concern when doing the medical brcause they ended negotiations and never looked back.
Also the reasoning wasnāt really given. This is usually because they do not want to ruin the playerās name from potential future moves. But one can only speculate itās because heās crocked.
Avoid him like a plague rat
If heās available for ā¬30m then heās worth a punt IMO
Did Liverpool pull back? I thought they reduced their offer by like 15m? Unless that was a ploy to save face because they knew Lyon would say no?
I miss the days when we had good crocks. If we could pay ā¬30m for 2007-2012 van Persie, Iād do it, so surely this is worth the gamble when the alternative is Iwobi, Ozil or Mkhitarayan.
Have any of you ever watched him play? Not sure if this is worse than āweāre too posh for Carrascoā, friends, Carrasco and Fekir are both twice as good as all the wide players in our squad were last season and the only thing preventing them from being that good here would be us. for various reasons. And for that money? Easy go. Resale value will prob. immediately be higher once they pull on our jersey anyway (if we donāt fuck up our business as usual lol)
We need a winger tho. This crippled french aint one.
We donāt need a winger. We need better defenders.
Unless the winger is free, Iām not interested.
Yes we do. Itās possible to need more than one thing at once.
A bit like saying we donāt need oxygen lol
No, itās really not
But when you canāt afford both, you go for what will make the biggest difference. And that isnāt a winger.
Unless theyāre free, in which case I will welcome them with open arms
A Jakey classic right there.
But when you canāt afford both, you go for what will make the biggest difference. And that isnāt a winger.
Thatās not what you said though. You said that we donāt need a winger, which is different to saying we need both but ranking a defender as being of a higher priority.
*facepalm