It was a gesture to help the kid make this “not about money” when he accepts their offer of wages that is probably 2-3x what we were negotiating.
We got blown out of the water on this - could quibble with some of our PR and behind the scenes negotiation and relationship-management, but let’s not make this a close call… Chelsea came in like a wrecking ball and could have at any point in time. Any “demand starts at x” is just as meaningless as anything else in negotiations - Shakhtar were looking for the best deal for them and Mudryk was absolutely swayable with a massive pay rise over Shakhtar and way higher wages than he would have gotten with us. The reason it was “ended quickly with Chelsea” is because we made it clear we weren’t negotiating further.
I wanted the kid, but we have progressively gotten more “comfortable” with more and more insane offer on this case… and one game cameo should not have any effect on that… seriously… the evidence was there that this was a special young player before or else none of this is relevant.
Plenty of players have special ingredients in the younger years and don’t turn into players worth 100 million (although tbh what does that even mean any more?) over their career. We’ll see about this guy.
For us, it means we have Trossard, this young star Polish defender, and another 40-50 million to spend this summer all things being equal. Is Mudryk a significantly better option for our title aspirations THIS year than Trossard? I dunno… long-term, no question we all wanted the Mud-man…
Anyway, Trossard will be useful at least through next year, we got a very talented young defender to even further shore up a strength (and young) and we have money in the bank to make more deals.
If we assume with Mudryk, our coffers are drained to the tune of maybe only 50-60 net to spend in the summer (which is still a lot and very few teams do this), that limits us… if we assume we now have some depth at attacking wings with Trossard covered at least for next year, another piece to give us solid depth and potential in defense, and 90-100 million, that allows us to sell one or two, then go get a Rice and another young attacker (for example).
Let’s chill and enjoy the fact we are top and Chelsea are 10th and couldn’t muster a goal against a mediocre Pool defense that is comparable to BHA, AV, CP, WHU, and Wolves and worse than Chelsea, ManU, Arsenal, City, and way worse than Newcastle.