Yeah I’m not sure how you offset it - that still seems squirrelly to me and I think for sure City is skirting the spirit of FFP through their self-funding sponsorships (although supposedly they have to be “market value”)…
Not being CL is a big deal, especially with all our spending and the INCREASE in wages (isn’t it you can’t INCREASE beyond a certain percentage?)… and City increased massively eitehr right before or during that transition, so now don’t actually have to increase that much and still have massive wages (same with Utd, probably Chelsea).
We should be exempt from FFP and all the other bollocks.
I’m pretty sure these rules are intended to prevent clubs with no money in the bank running on losses, not prevent clubs sitting on a pile of cash spending it.
Whatever the truth of this is, the club has made itself look small and cheap today. Need to get some decent PR around it.
Giving all the trolls on social media, dodgy presenters on talkshite and no doubt Fridays tabloids a free fucking hit at us.
Honestly just get pissed off with all this ridicule. Not classy at all.
The percentage increase rule seems dumb… there are surely plenty of sound financial “health” metrics they could use if objective was primarily about avoiding spiraling debt… “fair play” is a whole different animal and also needs rethinking.
Can we stop for a minute and consider that all these publications are probably fed to the media by the club in the never-ending struggle to bring prices down. I have no doubt in my mind every club is trying to squeeze as much cash from us as possible especially as we have the reputation of a financially stable and rich club.
In other words I don’t believe anything written in the papers and it’s all part of the negotiating process imo.
City is blatanly skirting FFP. There is no discussion about that. But it can’t be that the wage thing is only a problem for a very limited set of clubs. In fact only the three I mentioned it seems.