Not really sure what the ‘Denmark approach’ would solve? Tough on refugees sure. But the ‘Boriswave’ for example is already here.
What Denmark did right from I’ve read was not fuck about when this issue became a problem. However in the UK, this was a ‘problem’ in 2010 (Arguably before) that the Tories were meant to solve but made it all worse for 14 years.
I think the psychology of a Anti-immigration voter is not well understood. They want people out. Only one party this far is offering that. Unless Labour is going to do that, they’re not winning this issue.
Just reading it, it’s already stated Mahmood doesn’t want to go as far as the Danish did. Well half-arsing it worked so well for us up till this point, why not some more.
It reminds me of when Arsenal first started rebuilding and actually thought out a strategy to bring in the right young players after careful scouting and then Chelsea just started buying all the young players they could get their hands on and expected the same result.
Copying the headlines of someone else’s strategy isn’t going to work.
When those enclaves have higher rates of crime, unemployment, dependence on benefits, lack of linguistic ability, etc. then yes I do.
Areas like Voldsmose, Gellerup and Nordvest are essentially parallel societies where Danish values, culture, and language aren’t the norm - it even sometimes happens that ambulances and fire trucks need police escorts (which does not happen anywhere else).
Nørrebro was a famously progressive neighbourhood populated by hippies and the gay movement which opened its doors to immigrants in the 90s. In 2010 Pride had to reroute itself around Nørrebro because the immigrants there attacked the parade with rocks and urine filled balloons, and not that many years ago police had to ask gay and straight couples not to commit acts of PDA in the neighbourhood lest they provoke the inhabits to violence (which happened a few times). Police also warned Jews to not wear items identifying their religion.
So yes, in Denmark ethnic enclaves are usually symbolic of failed integration. Specific ethnicities that adhere to a monotheistic religion from the Middle East. These issues are not present in the Vietnamese, Thai, Polish etc. communities.
The thing with ‘integration’ is it has always been an abstract idea. The goalposts has always shifted on it is since there’s never been clear cut idea nor has there ever been a real attempt to enforce it. (by the state or otherwise). I mean if I recall under Boris Johnson’s bollocks immigration points system you could get a visa without speaking English. People have always been left to their devices to find their way. The results are predictable, comfort, safety in numbers, familiarity.
Personally, I have no problem with low immigration but I would hate something like the parallel societies law. I don’t even know where you’d begin practically. First of all Britain is stupid as hell with definitions like BAME where Caribbeans and Africans are put together even though we’re vastly different people. (Sorry Mr. Johnson, you gotta go. The threshold of Babatunde’s and Kofi’s are far too high) where you moving them too? We have literal chaos over asylum seeker hotels. People don’t like that shit. They’ll like a bunch of foreign looking people in higher numbers being moved in even less.
Kind of general news but it’s 10 years this weekend that 3 huge events happened.
My friend Nick Alexander was killed at the Bataclan in Paris.
My father-in-law told me that his cancer was terminal. He would die just 7 days later.
My neuropathic illness started.
To mark the events, I took my wife to see one of her favourite new bands in London, sticking two fingers up at those who committed a massacre at a music venue, sticking two fingers up at my illness and also reminding ourselves that the best way to deal with bad memories is to make good new ones.
Next weekend Colchester pays tribute to Nick and all those killed in Paris on that terrible night with a night of music in 10 different venues.