Peter Sutcliffe is dead. Good week this.
Almost as crazy as the man himself was āWereside Jackā who pretended to be the Yorkshire Ripper in audio tapes. A quick google shows they eventually caught him from his DNA in 2006 and gave him 8 years
Yeah a right prick him. Badly handled case at times. Very scary time for females in that area at the time.
My mum used to walk home around one of the areas it happened.
Sutcliffe was frequently visited by Jimmy Saville and 2 of the victims were found near Savilleās flat.
I can remember Leeds fans chanting his name.
He should have been hanged in 81ā
The daily racist at it again
Iām 23. I came from little. I need to protect not just my future but my familyās too.
Why caveat your investments like this lol
Why not?
Because itās disingenuous, imo.
If that kinda statement came from a multimillionaire involved in any sector theyād be slapped down for talking pure BS.
I donāt think Rashford or his family are going to find themselves on the breadline any time soon. If you havenāt got an issue with it thatās fine too, agree to disagree
40 percent of former Premier League players go bankrupt . Iām sure Rashford is smarter than most of those guys (hence the investments), but letās not act they donāt have to think of other income outside of/after football.
Who is acting like this? I have zero issue with footballers investing and sound fiscal management but on the same hand donāt act you need to āprotectā you and your family with million pound real estate investments whilst collecting Ā£200k p/w at 23 years old.
Itās fakeness imo, designed to obtain sympathy.
Id imagine itās more to counter act the perceived slur from the report.
Classic Daily Mail deflecting the issue at hand.
Is it not clear to most people his investments have nothing to do with his campaigning?
Itās silly and a bit tone deaf to caveat your business dealings with some narrative about protecting your family when you have more wealth that 99.9% of people in this country. If that statement came from any other multimillionaire it would come across as stupid but I guess Rashford is a popular footballer you canāt highlight that?
I know what your getting at here and agree with the broad context your going with.
I often think football and footballers comprise peopleās thought processes at times.
Have major battles with myself at times on this. Can be debating homelessness in one thread and jumping to another wanting 60 million spent on a rival player.
I donāt see it that way, heās just stating his motivation. Now whether his reasoning holds up is up for debate but I donāt see anything wrong with him defending himself.
If itās not āprotectingā (if the 200k p/w payments end) his wealth than what is it? Greed?
Depends on your own viewpoint. Some people might see it as greed, some might not. Iām a cynic, I donāt just donāt like disingenuous arguments
In your opinion itās disingenuous.
Yes
Or maybe when he says āprotectā he means he wants to protect his ability to live a certain lifestyle which requires millions?