Maybe, but there would still be religious tension even without partition.
Colonialism didn’t help either if we’re going to that far back, the Brits were always good at divide and conquer.
1 Like
This is true but it’s also true that if not for British, India wouldn’t have been one country
Odd name
So why would anyone pay for this, when they use Netlix/Amazon which don’t require a tv licence?
1 Like
That name. Kill it, kill it with fire 
1 Like
All I’m thinking is “shitbox”, don’t think I’ll be able to get that out of my head now whenever I hear it mentioned.
2 Likes
Will soon be the only way to get the best British made content if you live outside the UK. Some have suggested ITV and BBC will be removing their content from third party streaming services.
I guess it could have a market overseas
The only way this works is if they pull all their content from Netflix/Amazon, and shut down iPlayer and ITV Player.
And not having it available to an international market would be a massive mistake.
“co.uk”
It’s already operational in North America
https://www.itv.com/presscentre/press-releases/britbox-launches-canada
Fair enough. 
North America makes much more sense.
I bet North America are gagging to get a string of Doctor Who series available to them
There is some animosity. Especially after, as @SDGooner says, 1984. That piss drinking paedophile Gandhi didnt help relations back in '47 either
1 Like
Now I cant, lol. It’s a good idea though, amalgamate all of ITV, Channel 4, BBC in one streaming service.
Well done Imran Khan. Played it perfectly.
Trump 
Ironically Abhinandhan means Thank you.
Trump is such a cunt what did that fckwit do to help the situation 
absolute bellend 
cringeworthy nectarine looking cunt.