Maybe Arteta can get him back on track but he’d have to take a massive pay cut.
No way we pay him £250/300k pw
I’m not a huge fan of having to measure a strikers work as goal contributions but those are pretty decent numbers tbh. He’ll be on stupid wages and he doesn’t really seem to know where his best position is yet, I personally couldn’t be bothered with the headache. It’s also hard to see any scenario play out where he comes here in some kind of move that’s financially beneficial to us, we’ll get absolutely fleeced and he’s just not it for that kind of big money they’d ask.
3 Likes
You mean you’d rather have Lacazette score than record 10 “ball pressures” in a match?
So retrograde 
1 Like
I’d take Rashford to be honest. Can play across the front 3, is hungry (no Rashford packed lunch) and has a bit of a point to prove. If you can get Rashford and a target man (for rotation) to bolster our attack, all of a sudden it looks much more promising next season.
50m could get it done if he has a year left.
We already took one Welbeck off them. Absolutely not again.
2 Likes
£50m with a year left on his deal and coming off a horrible season? I’d be fuming
4 Likes
I’d lose my shit more than when we confirmed the Willian transfer. That would be horrendous business.*
*Unless KSE have decided that money is no object but that’s unlikely.
Also how does it look promising with Rashford in and a backup striker btw? lol
1 Like
If we go for this type of experienced wide forward I’d much rather take Gnabry or Sterling.
5 Likes
It’s not even a debate really. If we’ve got £50m and big wages to pump on a wide man then Sterling and Gnabry are the two obvious choices not headless Rashford
4 Likes
I’d be loathe to do them a favour too
I look at their squad and wouldn’t take any of their players for various reasons.
3 Likes
Look, I’d also prefer Sterling or Gnabry, but both are probably out of our league.
United as it stands is a terrible environment for any player. The beast tgat is C. Ron went 8 games without a goal. I am in no doubt that Rashford is far better than he is showing this season. Pepe and Nelson out with Rashford in is a big upgrade in my eyes.
nope no way do i want another player that comes in spouting soundbites about politics getting involved with lots of different stuff and they start becoming more interested in what they are spouting than doing what they are paid for. I don’t want this guy anywhere near the club i feel he is toxic we have spent ages getting rid of this type i reckon he will balls up the team chemistry.
2 Likes
Yeah! Fuck those kids who need lunches!
1 Like
he can do what he pleases but if he cares so much just do it you don’t need the PR and crap. There is more than just the lunches though…he seems very self absorbed and i reckon he is toxic but each to their own.
Am I the only one that would take Rashford? The assumption he’s gonna do a Welbeck if he comes here is a big lol
But he couldn’t just do it. He needed the publicity in order for the campaign to be a success.
Rashford has had a poor season footballing wise, so it’s understandable if people are unsure on him, but him spending time and money on feeding poor children is definitely not the stick you should pick to beat him with
I’d take him off the back of 18 goals and 9 assists but he’s been awful this season and don’t want to reward that with a 300k person contract which is what it would require.
He’s blow up our wage structure which we’ve worked so hard to get under control again
2 Likes
He’d have to come cheap, take a pay cut and also not count as our marquee signing. He’s not a number one option anymore. Feels like a West Ham signing to me.
2 Likes