Sorry, I did not think much of India, your place, but I thought of U.S., Canada, China, Jana, Asia, some other countries else.
I see stores selling Adidas, Nikes (and their sponsored teams) everywhere, NOT EXCLUSIVELY to their brand stores or teams shops only.
If Puma is not really paying us that much (now we know, compare to other teams), and limit our sales (shirt) only exclusively to certain stores, that’s not my problem.
And don’t you think the extremely result oriented nature of footballing world would have had that same idea & allowed the chump with best offer to be their shirt sponsor.
Yet if i check, Bayern are 18m behind Liverpool’s deal. & many such examples as below.
This table was created before Liverpool’s deal, in May’16
We’re not Bayern and we’re not Madrid. Neither are Liverpool. So they went with the chumps because that gave them more money in order to help them bridge the gap.
30m wasnt even a bad deal at the time but I jist wonder if we had others offering us more…
your concern is how many stores that are close to you, easy for you (and fans in India).
my concern is, our performance on the field.
the figures you put up has no value to me. Puma can give us 100m, if we don’t invest properly back on the team, the team is still shit.
you care the access on buying things, I care the number of wins of our team, and when we win more, win more trophies/titles, revenue will come eventually.
who is shortsighted? who is naïve? I don’t want to argue with you at all.
Below my post there is a flag symbol.
Click it if you want to report.
But next time you intend to discuss shirt sponsorship, stick with it; don’t fucking throw
‘You care about shirts, i care about number of wins’ non sense.
@ronniec the little flag under a post allows you to report it, but @Trion maybe you could just cut out the insults and save Ronnie the bother yes? He can discuss things on here however he sees fit s long as he isn’t breaking the rules.